Skip to content
(920) 655-2193|Serving Green Bay & Northeast Wisconsin
Send photos, get a price within 24 hours
Rise & Shine Concrete
Get My Price
Learn · Concrete Lifting

Foam vs. Mudjacking: An Honest Comparison for Wisconsin Concrete

The short answer

Mudjacking and foam lifting both raise sunken concrete by pumping material underneath it. Mudjacking uses a heavy cement-based slurry through holes typically 1–2" across, and it usually costs less upfront. Foam (polyjacking) uses a lightweight polyurethane through 5/8" holes, won't wash out, and lets you drive on the slab the same day.

By Rob Diederich, owner · Updated
8 min read

You got two quotes for the same sunken slab. One crew mudjacks, the other uses foam, and the numbers aren't close. Both say their way is better.

Know this up front: foam is the only lifting method we use. We'll still tell you where mudjacking makes sense, because sometimes it does.

For why slabs sink and every repair option, replacement included, see how concrete lifting works. This is just the head-to-head.

What Each Method Pumps Under Your Slab

Every lifting method fills the empty or soft space under a slab, then keeps filling until the slab rises. The difference is what goes in.

  • Mudjacking pumps a slurry of soil or sand, cement, and water. Some mixes add lime, fly ash, or clay. It's thick, gritty, and heavy, and the pump pressure is what raises the slab. Once it sets, it's a hard, cement-like fill.
  • Stone slurry grout is a cousin of mudjacking: finely ground limestone mixed with water, sometimes with cement added.
  • Polyurethane foam, or polyjacking, starts as two liquids that mix at the injection gun. They react and expand into a rigid, closed-cell foam. The expansion is what does the lifting.

The Side-by-Side

Polyurethane foamMudjacking
Hole size5/8", about a dimeTypically 1–2"
Weight of the fillA few pounds per cubic footAround 100 lb per cubic foot, sometimes more
What lifts the slabThe foam expandingPressure from the pumped slurry
WaterWaterproof once cured, won't wash outCan erode if water keeps getting underneath
Back in useWalk right away, drive the same dayUsually a day to a few days before it should carry a car
Upfront costHigherUsually lower
LifespanGenerally rated longer, with no single agreed numberCost guides commonly say 5–10 years when done well
Patches left behindSmallLarger
Interior slabsWell suited: small holes, little messPossible, but messier
What the fill isPetroleum-based plasticMineral-based (soil, sand, cement)

That last row is a fair point in mudjacking's favor. If you'd rather not have plastic in the ground, mudjacking and stone slurry are mineral fills.

Where the Differences Actually Show Up

The holes

A dime-sized patch and a patch the size of a quarter or bigger don't look the same, especially on a front walk or a stamped or colored patio. Every hole gets patched either way, and no patch perfectly matches 20-year-old concrete. Smaller patches are just easier to live with.

Foam: about 5/8"Roughly penny-sizedMudjacking: about 1-1/2" to 2"Dashed ring = 1-1/2", solid = 2"DRAWN TO SCALE

The weight you're adding to soil that already failed

This is the difference we think matters most.

Say a 10-by-10-foot driveway slab has dropped, and there's an average of 2" of empty space under it. That's about 17 cubic feet to fill.

  • Mudjack slurry at roughly 100 lb per cubic foot: about 1,700 pounds of new weight sitting on the same soil.
  • Lifting foam at a few pounds per cubic foot: somewhere around 50 to 100 pounds.

Firm, dry ground may carry that extra weight fine. Loose backfill or soggy clay, usually the reason the slab sank in the first place, may not.

Washout

Spring melt and a wet April send a lot of water under slabs around here. Cured foam is closed-cell, so it doesn't soak up water and doesn't erode. A cement-based slurry is more porous, and if water keeps running under the slab, it can wear away at the fill.

Highway engineers have seen the same thing. A 2017 Missouri Department of Transportation research brief on slab stabilization reported that cement grout had been phased out there because of its erosion potential, with polyurethane now doing the job.

Neither fill stops water from eroding the soil around it, so fix the downspouts whichever method you pick.

Getting your slab back

Foam sets within minutes. You can walk on it right away and drive on it the same day. Mudjacking slurry has to set up first, and national cost guides put that at one to three days before the slab should carry real weight. For a driveway, or the only path to your front door, that counts.

Upfront cost

Mudjacking almost always quotes lower. National cost guides updated in 2026 put mudjacking at roughly $3–$6 per square foot and foam at $5–$25, a much wider spread. The fill is the big reason. Soil, sand, and cement are cheap. Lifting foam isn't.

The gap can grow on a big washout under a big slab, where material becomes a larger share of a foam quote. If the ground is dry and stable and price matters most, that's a legitimate reason to choose mudjacking.

Longevity

Most longevity claims come from someone selling one method. Cost guides commonly give mudjacking 5–10 years when done well and credit foam with lasting longer, without agreeing on a number. Either way, the fill is rarely what gives out first. The soil under it moves, and water is almost always what moves it.

Wisconsin Conditions That Tip the Scale

  • Slow-draining clay. Much of the Green Bay area sits on clay and silt laid down in old glacial lakes. It holds water and drains slowly, so the ground under a slab stays wet long after every rain and thaw. A light fill that doesn't mind water counts for more here.
  • Loose backfill along the house. Stoops, patios, walks, and AC pads next to the foundation sit on soil that was pushed back in after the basement was dug. It's the softest ground on most lots, and the worst place to stack heavy fill.
  • Spring melt. A winter's worth of snow melting at once soaks that backfill. That's why so many sunken slabs show up in April and May.
  • Frost. Wet, fine-grained soil heaves when it freezes, and neither method stops that. A slab that only looks off in late winter may be frost-heaved, not sunk, and nobody should lift it until the ground thaws. Our lifting season runs from spring thaw to freeze-up.
  • Road salt. Salt flakes the surface but has nothing to do with sinking, and neither method fixes it. A penetrating sealer helps protect concrete that's still sound, which is a separate job we also do.

Which One Fits Your Situation?

Your situationBetter fitWhy
Sidewalk square out by the street, firm dry ground, lowest price winsMudjacking is reasonableWeight and washout matter less on stable soil
Patio, stoop, or walk right against the foundationFoamLight fill on the loosest soil on the lot
AC or heat pump padFoamSmall holes, light fill, and little mess around the equipment (see our AC pad guide)
Garage floor or other interior slabFoamSmall holes and no gritty slurry inside the building
Slab where a downspout or sump line was dumpingFoam, after you move the waterA fill that won't wash out, in the spot water already proved it can reach
Driveway you need to park on tonightFoamDrive on it the same day
Stamped, colored, or exposed-aggregate concreteFoamSmaller patches where patches show the most
Slab that was mudjacked before and sank againUsually foamAdds very little weight on top of what's already down there
Large washout under a big slab, firm ground, tight budgetGet quotes for bothMaterial cost can make mudjacking much cheaper here
Slab broken into pieces, crumbling, or pushed up by roots or frostNeitherNo lifting method fixes these. See is concrete lifting worth it

Where Stone Slurry Fits

Stone slurry grout sits in the middle. Its holes are about 1" across, smaller than mudjacking and bigger than foam, and it's a mineral fill, which suits people who'd rather skip plastic. It's still a heavy, water-based mix, and when the blend is light on cement, water can erode the limestone over time. Set time depends on the mix, so ask before you plan to park on it.

Comparing Two Quotes? Make Them Apples to Apples

Before you compare prices, check:

  • Same slabs, same goal. Are both lifting the same squares to the same finished height and slope?
  • What's underground. Did they ask about buried downspout lines, sump discharge, and drain pipes? Any fill pumped under a slab will follow an open pipe.
  • Joint sealing. Is caulking the joints and cracks included? Sealing keeps water from getting back under the slab, whatever fill is down there.
  • The cause. Did they tell you what sank it and what to fix? If not, you'll be doing this again no matter which method you pick.
  • What happens if it settles again. Ask whether there's a written warranty and what conditions come with it.

For vetting the contractor itself, see how to choose a concrete contractor.

Questions

Common questions

Is polyjacking the same thing as foam lifting?

Yes. Polyjacking, poly leveling, foam lifting, and foam jacking all mean raising concrete with injected polyurethane foam. Mudjacking is the slurry version, and slabjacking is a general term that can mean either.

Why does mudjacking cost less?

Mostly the material. Soil, sand, and cement cost a fraction of what lifting foam does, so the more fill a job needs, the wider the price gap gets.

Is mudjacking outdated?

No. It's the older method, but it still works, and on dry, stable ground without a water problem it can hold up well. Its weak spots are weight and water, which is why it struggles most on soft or wet soil.

Can you foam lift a slab that was mudjacked before?

Usually, yes. Foam goes in through new, small holes and fills whatever space has opened up under the slab since the first lift. The old, larger patches will still be visible.

Why are mudjacking holes so much bigger?

The slurry is thick and gritty, so it needs a bigger opening to pump through. Foam goes in as a thin liquid and expands once it's under the slab, so a 5/8" hole is plenty.

Do you offer mudjacking?

No. Foam is the only lifting method we use. If your slab sits on firm, dry ground and mudjacking would serve you just as well for less money, we'll tell you that.

Keep reading

Related

Learn · Concrete Lifting
How Does Concrete Lifting Work?

How concrete lifting works, why slabs sink in northeast Wisconsin, foam vs. mudjacking vs. stone slurry vs. replacement, and what lifting can't fix.

Learn · Concrete Lifting
Is Concrete Lifting Worth It?

Foam concrete lifting is fast and costs far less than replacement, but it has real limits. Honest pros, cons, and a lift-or-replace table.

Learn · Concrete Lifting
Foam Concrete Lifting Problems

Does lifting foam break down, shrink, or get into pipes? Which foam concrete lifting problems are real, which are myths, and how each one is prevented.

Not Sure Which Method Fits? Send Photos. No Sales Call.

Send a wide photo of the slab, a close-up of the worst edge with a tape measure standing next to it, and a shot of the nearest downspout. We'll tell you whether foam is the right fit and what it costs, or whether a cheaper method would do the job on your slab.

Get My PriceCall (920) 655-2193